docs: move RFC draft to issue

2026-08-15 01:12:11 +00:00 · 2026-05-19 13:22:31 -07:00
1 changed files with 0 additions and 36 deletions
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
-# RFC 0001: Org Claim Disputes and Account Recovery After Owner-Initiated Deletion
-
-Status: Draft
-
-Audience: Community review
-
-Canonical docs target: TBD
-
-## Context
-
-ClawHub needs a transparent process for two related trust and ownership questions:
-
- how organization or owner namespace claims are evaluated and disputed
- how account recovery works after an owner-initiated account deletion
-
-This RFC is a lightweight discussion record. It is not the final policy, and it should eventually be replaced by a public docs page once the decision is accepted.
-
-## Goals
-
- Give the community a clear place to review and comment before policy is finalized.
- Make owner namespace claims, disputes, and account recovery predictable.
- Separate public policy from private reviewer-only checks or sensitive evidence handling.
-
-## Non-goals
-
- Define every internal moderator or admin runbook step.
- Publish private account, identity, or dispute evidence.
- Decide implementation details for every API, CLI, or admin-console change.
-
-## Open Questions
-
- What evidence should be required to claim an organization or owner namespace?
- What evidence should be required to dispute an existing claim?
- What should happen when a namespace maps to a deleted or inactive owner account?
- What recovery path should exist after an owner intentionally deletes their account?
- Which decisions should be public docs, and which details should stay in an internal reviewer runbook?