mirror of
https://github.com/rookiestar28/ComfyUI-OpenClaw.git
synced 2026-08-14 08:52:45 +00:00
docs: refresh security scanning references
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,6 +3,11 @@
|
||||
Date: 2026-04-08
|
||||
Scope: Repository planning guidance for GitHub-native security scanning policy during and after the residual alert wave.
|
||||
|
||||
Current status:
|
||||
|
||||
- the repository now uses the committed advanced CodeQL workflow as its authoritative scanner baseline
|
||||
- GitHub `Code scanning` and `Secret scanning` were both brought back to `0` open findings during the `S91` closeout
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Why CodeQL Belongs in GitHub Actions
|
||||
|
||||
This repository has a large security surface:
|
||||
@@ -31,6 +36,7 @@ GitHub-hosted validation should own:
|
||||
- code-scanning alert lifecycle
|
||||
- long-running static dataflow analysis
|
||||
- alert triage over the default branch
|
||||
- secret-scanning closure workflow when a finding is confirmed to be historical or non-live
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Recommended CodeQL Rollout Model
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ This note records the repository decision for GitHub CodeQL rollout and the spec
|
||||
|
||||
## Operational Notes
|
||||
|
||||
- The repository currently shows CodeQL alerts generated by GitHub's dynamic/default setup pipeline.
|
||||
- Committing `codeql.yml` creates the repository-owned advanced-setup baseline, but the repository owner may still need to switch GitHub Security settings from default setup to advanced setup if the UI-managed default remains authoritative.
|
||||
- The repository now uses the committed `.github/workflows/codeql.yml` workflow as the authoritative advanced CodeQL baseline.
|
||||
- GitHub `default setup` was switched to `not-configured` during `S91`, so scanner policy now lives in version control instead of the repository UI.
|
||||
- The first successful advanced-baseline runs completed on `main` during the residual security closeout wave.
|
||||
- Local acceptance for CodeQL workflow changes must use repo-local seam tests against the workflow contract; do not require a full local CodeQL run unless a future task explicitly asks for it.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -5,10 +5,15 @@ Scope: Residual GitHub Security findings that remained open after the first `S73
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Purpose
|
||||
|
||||
This reference captures the follow-up repair strategy for the residual GitHub Security findings that still point at the current `main` branch after the initial CodeQL / Dependabot cleanup wave.
|
||||
This reference captures the follow-up repair strategy that was used for the residual GitHub Security findings that still pointed at `main` after the initial CodeQL / Dependabot cleanup wave.
|
||||
|
||||
This document is planning-only guidance. It is not itself an implementation record.
|
||||
|
||||
Closure note:
|
||||
|
||||
- this intake reference is now historical context only
|
||||
- the residual wave was closed during `S91`, with GitHub `Code scanning` and `Secret scanning` reduced to `0` open findings on 2026-04-08
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Current Residual Findings Baseline
|
||||
|
||||
Authenticated GitHub Security review showed this residual baseline at intake:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user